KRIEGMAN v. AMATO


20 N.J. Super. 222 (1952)

89 A.2d 487

PAULINE KRIEGMAN AND BEATRICE SELTZER, PLAINTIFFS, v. FRANK AMATO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided June 11, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Abram A. Golden, attorney for the defendant.

Mr. Milton J. Finkelstein (Mr. Julius Stein, appearing), attorney for the plaintiffs.


CONLON, J.C.C.

The defendant moves by virtue of Rule 7:6-1(b) (as amended January 1, 1952) to transfer the action to the Superior Court from the Essex County District Court where it was instituted. Since an application of this nature is frequently granted as a matter of course and it has been concluded that this motion should be denied, and since a resolution of the issue involves to some extent the discretion of the court, it becomes necessary to consider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases