1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 195 F.2d
  5. 195 F.2d 44 (1952)
 

STANDARD OIL DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. MARZALL

No. 11067.

195 F.2d 44 (1952)

STANDARD OIL DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. MARZALL.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 7, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore S. Kenyon, New York City, of the Bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom W. Frederick Weigester, Washington, D. C., and Paul O. Dunham, Elizabeth, N. J., were on the brief, for appellant.

Clarence W. Moore, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. C., with whom E. L. Reynolds, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from dismissal of a complaint under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent on an improved process for treating gaseous fluids with solid materials, and more particularly for converting hydrocarbon oils in the presence of solid catalysts. We think the District Court was not clearly wrong in finding, in substantial agreement with the Patent Office, that the appealed claims do not show invention over the prior art.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases