1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 9 N.J.
  5. 9 N.J. 225 (1952)
 

CRASTER v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF NEWARK

9 N.J. 225 (1952)

87 A.2d 721

CHARLES V. CRASTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 7, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph A. Ward argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Charles Handler, attorney).

Mr. Michael N. Chanalis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Chanalis, Lynch & Maloney, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

The question here is whether, under the circumstances presented, a person who has qualified under each of two separate pension retirement plans has the privilege of electing the one most beneficial to him.

The plaintiff entered the employ of the City of Newark as a health officer on June 1, 1915, and continued in office without interruption until August 15, 1951, at which time he had attained the age...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases