1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 20 N.J.
  5. 20 N.J. Super. 203 (1952)
 

MIDLER v. HEINOWITZ

20 N.J. Super. 203 (1952)

89 A.2d 451

HARRY L. MIDLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ABRAHAM M. HEINOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 13, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Kraemer argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Andrew B. Crummy argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Crummy & Consodine, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The partnership accounting action involved here originated in the former Court of Chancery, the bill of complaint being filed on December 20, 1943. Thereafter, an order was made directing an accounting, with a reference to a special master. The defendant took numerous exceptions to the master's report, which were heard and determined by the Chancery Division. On appeal to this court, the ensuing judgment of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases