PERLBERG v. GEMINDER


20 N.J. Super. 191 (1952)

89 A.2d 448

MURRAY A. PERLBERG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR GEMINDER AND DAVID GEMINDER, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS WESTCOTT PRODUCTS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 11, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Harkavy and Lieb, attorneys).

Mr. Herman E. Dultz argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Dultz, Miller & Zeller, attorneys).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of the defendants at the close of plaintiff's case. The substantial question to be decided is whether the trial court erred in not submitting to the jury the issue of the reasonable value of plaintiff's services. The contention that there was also error in taking from the jury the question of whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases