1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 104 F.Supp.
  5. 104 F.Supp. 99 (1952)
 

PRICE v. UNITED STATES

No. 49681.

104 F.Supp. 99 (1952)

PRICE v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

April 15, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel T. Ansell and Burr Tracy Ansell, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Wilson Myers, Washington, D. C., Holmes Baldridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Thomas O. Fleming, Washington, D. C., on the brief, for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

JONES, Chief Judge.

On October 2, 1951, this court made special findings of fact and determined that plaintiff's service in the National Guard prior to 1916 was service in the "federally recognized" National Guard within the meaning of the Army and Air Force Vitalization and Retirement Equalization Act of June 29, 1948, 62 Stat. 1081, 10 U.S.C.A. § 580 et seq. Plaintiff thus became entitled to retired pay under that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases