PETRONE v. MARGOLIS


20 N.J. Super. 180 (1952)

89 A.2d 476

LIZETTA PETRONE, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT PETRONE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RONALD MARGOLIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 17, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Furst argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Manuel L. Barrett, on the brief).

Mr. Arthur J. Blake argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Markley & Broadhurst, attorneys; Mr. Edward A. Markley, of counsel).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The mishap out of which the present litigation has arisen was the occurrence of a collision of an automobile owned by the defendant with a utility pole at or near No. 22 Broadway in the City of Newark at about 1:30 A.M. on May 25, 1950. The vehicle was admittedly owned and probably being operated at the time by the defendant. The plaintiff's intestate was an invited passenger in the car, who sustained a bodily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases