1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 24 N.J.
  5. 24 N.J. Super. 165 (1952)
 

BLUT v. KATZ

24 N.J. Super. 165 (1952)

93 A.2d 775

GUSSIE BLUT, AS EXECUTRIX UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ISAAC BLUT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN KATZ AND HERMAN MARKS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 23, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Harry Chashin and Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal, on the brief).

Mr. Hymen D. Goldberg argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Mr. Abram Waks, attorney).

Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and CONLON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The plaintiff, Gussie Blut, as the executrix of the last will and testament of her husband, Isaac Blut, who died October 28, 1949, instituted this action against his two surviving partners, Benjamin Katz and Herman Marks. The complaint sought a dissolution of the partnership, an accounting of partnership transactions and the appointment of a receiver. The defendants filed a counterclaim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases