CRUTE v. CRUTE

34023.

86 Ga. App. 96 (1952)

70 S.E.2d 727

CRUTE v. CRUTE et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 6, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O. C. Hancock, D. W. Rolader, for plaintiff in error.

Paul Webb, Solicitor-General, Charlie O. Murphy, contra.


GARDNER, P. J.

The sole question for determination is whether or not the trial judge abused his discretion in adjudging the plaintiff below (plaintiff in error here) in contempt of court. The plaintiff was on the witness stand and being questioned as to his financial worth and ability, this being a suit for divorce in which the wife had filed her cross-action asking that the plaintiff be required to pay alimony. The witness was before the court and his manner on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases