MURCHIE, Chief Justice.
This case presents the single, very narrow, issue whether an insurer, who has contracted to cover the legal liability of its assured for damage to property during its "loading, unloading, skidding, lowering and hoisting", is holden for a loss caused by the use of dynamite to sever property, intended to be hoisted to make its moving possible, from a foundation to which it was attached so firmly that severance by a hoisting device, pry bars and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
