BERCOVITCH v. TANBURN


103 F.Supp. 62 (1952)

BERCOVITCH v. TANBURN.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 7, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Moers, New York City, for plaintiff.

Stone & Feller, New York City, Leo H. Hirsch, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for defendant.


McGOHEY, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction over the subject matter. Plaintiff, a citizen of Canada, is the mother-in-law of defendant, a citizen of New York. She brings this action to recover monies expended for claimed necessaries she allegedly provided her daughter, defendant's wife.

The motion is grounded upon the contention that this action involves domestic relations, a subject not within the jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases