MELE v. CERENZIE

No. 31937.

40 Wn.2d 123 (1952)

241 P.2d 669

JOHN MELE, Respondent, v. A.B. CERENZIE et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

March 6, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cornelius E. Collier, for appellants.

Murphy & Bantz, for respondent.


HILL, J.

This began as an action to recover three thousand dollars of the four thousand dollars paid a real-estate broker on the sale of a half interest in certain real property, but, on the basis of a trial amendment, the plaintiff sought recovery of the entire four thousand dollars.

The complaint alleged, in brief, that John Mele, hereinafter called Mele, obtained the services of A.B. Cerenzie, hereinafter called Cerenzie, "by conversation," for the purpose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases