1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 108 F.Supp.
  5. 108 F.Supp. 52 (1952)
 

PEERLESS HOSIERY CO. v. NORTHERN INS. CO.

Civ. A. No. 3392.

108 F.Supp. 52 (1952)

PEERLESS HOSIERY CO. Inc. v. NORTHERN INS. CO. et al.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

May 9, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Klein & Klein, New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff.

John C. Flanagan, New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

The defendants have suggested four different grounds on which they contend they should be granted a judgment.

1. They contend that the plaintiff's failure to give written notice of loss or to file proofs of loss clearly is a bar to the action. This defense is overruled. It is true that the policies were intended to make the giving of such notice and the filing of proofs a condition precedent to recovery. Fields v. Metropolitan Life...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases