PERIGOT v. STEIKER


18 N.J. Super. 134 (1952)

86 A.2d 788

CHARLES PERIGOT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACOB STEIKER, MEYER STEIKER, DEFENDANTS, AND SYDNEY STEIKER, TRADING AS STEIKER MOTORS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 13, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph J. De Luccia, on the brief).

Mr. Stephen Mongiello argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and Wm.J. BRENNAN, JR.


The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

A course of common events sometimes produces an aspect of legal complexity. Here the plaintiff merely sought to dispose of his model 1939 truck and acquire two model 1944 trucks. We relate the eventualities.

The plaintiff negotiated with one Rawlings who was a salesman in the employ of the defendant Sydney Steiker, trading as Steiker Motors. The bartering between them resulted in the execution on March...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases