MATTER OF RAMSEY v. GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO.


279 A.D. 1106 (1952)

In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Ramsey, Respondent, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

May 7, 1952.


The evidence supports the board's finding that the place of claimant's employment and the circumstances and conditions thereof caused her exposure to flour dust which resulted in the affliction which disabled her. A feature of claimant's employment was its fixed location which brought about the exposure as a natural and unavoidable risk and incident of her employment. This we think brought the claim within the coverage of the statute. (Matter of Eckert v. Commander Larabee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases