1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 10 N.J.
  5. 10 N.J. 123 (1952)
 

MIDLER v. HEINOWITZ

10 N.J. 123 (1952)

89 A.2d 458

HARRY L. MIDLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ABRAHAM M. HEINOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 16, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Kraemer argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Andrew B. Crummy argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Crummy & Consodine, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.

Under an order of reference entered in the former Court of Chancery on January 12, 1945, an account was taken by a special master of the joint venture engaged in by the parties during 1938 in the buying for resale of manufacturers' surplus and scrap. The master filed his report on February 8, 1949, and the defendant filed exceptions. After hearing upon the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases