SCHEUPLEIN v. SCHEUPLEIN


19 N.J. Super. 113 (1952)

88 A.2d 23

BERTHA ELIZABETH SCHEUPLEIN, GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF EDWARD JOSEPH SCHEUPLEIN, AN INFANT, AND BERTHA ELIZABETH SCHEUPLEIN, PLAINTIFFS, v. ERNEST GEORGE SCHEUPLEIN AND MARY M. SCHEUPLEIN, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided April 16, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry J. Diamond, attorney for the plaintiffs.

Mr. Constantine Donato, attorney for defendant Mary M. Scheuplein.


GOLDMANN, J.S.C.

Defendant Mary M. Scheuplein (hereinafter referred to as "Mary") moves to dismiss the complaint filed by Bertha Elizabeth Scheuplein (hereinafter referred to as "Bertha"), individually and as guardian ad litem of her son, Edward Joseph Scheuplein ("Edward"), now over 18 years old. Plaintiffs are Connecticut residents. The defendants are the moving party and her husband, Ernest George Scheuplein ("Ernest"). The following facts appear from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases