1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 280 A.D.
  5. 280 A.D. 1024 (1952)
 

HOLLY v. VERRASTRO

280 A.D. 1024 (1952)

Ellen A. Holly, Respondent-Appellant, v. Antoinette A. Verrastro et al., Respondents, and Ralph A. Snyder et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Mary A. Owens, Respondent-Appellant, v. Antoinette A. Verrastro et al., Respondents, and Ralph A. Snyder et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.) Antoinette A. Verrastro, Respondent, v. Nestor Bros., Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 3.) Leonard G. Verrastro, Respondent, v. Nestor Bros., Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.) Nestor Bros., Inc., Appellant, v. Leonard G. Verrastro et al., Respondents. (Action No. 5.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

November 17, 1952.

Traffic at the intersection was controlled by automatic signal lights of the usual red and green type, which were in operation at the time. Each driver claimed to be proceeding into the intersection on a green light, and this issue of fact was the crux of the litigation as affecting liability. The principal question involved in all these appeals is whether there is evidence to support the verdicts and whether the verdicts are against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases