While the testimony is conflicting, the record contains evidence from which a jury could find that, contrary to the usual and customary practice on town road bridges, there was no guardrail, reflectors, or other marking on the westerly side of the bridge, and that this condition had continued for a substantial period of time prior to the accident, and was the proximate cause of the accident. The question of plaintiff's contributory negligence was properly left to the jury...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
