The verdict, implying that the explosion was caused by appellant's negligence, is against the weight of the evidence. Furthermore, it was prejudicial error to permit Dr. Shaw to be cross-examined with reference to statements contained in an article written by Dr. Green, to the effect that none of the sixty-three static fires referred to therein occurred under a setup which was regarded as offering maximum protection, and that in none of such cases was there present even such...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
