1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 252 S.W.2d
  5. 252 S.W.2d 1003 (1952)
 

WARE v. WRIGHT

No. 14534.

252 S.W.2d 1003 (1952)

WARE v. WRIGHT et al.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

October 31, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ed. C. Stearns, Dallas, for appellant.

Fritz, Goldberg & Alexander, Dallas, H. P. Kucera, City Atty. and H. Louis Nichols, Asst. City Atty., of Dallas, for appellees.

BOND, Chief Justice.

Appellant V. L. Ware, as plaintiff in the court below, instituted suit against appellees E. Roy Wright and Edward C. Fritz, and two others, not parties in this appeal, jointly and severally for damages actual and exemplary allegedly resulting from malicious prosecution. This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered in the suit on motion of Wright and Fritz, defendants, under Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, that the plaintiff take...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases