CUSHING v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY

No. 13887.

198 F.2d 1021 (1952)

Gertrude Picard CUSHING, etc., et al. v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY et al.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

October 9, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Morrison, Arthur A. de la Houssaye, Raymond H. Kierr, Gerard A. Rault, New Orleans, La., for appellants.

Eberhard P. Deutsch, Brunswick G. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., for appellees.

Before HOLMES, STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

It is considered and ordered that the petition for rehearing herein filed, be and the same is hereby denied.

RIVES, Circuit Judge (dissenting).

A reconsideration of this case compels me to agree with the opinion of the learned district judge, Cushing v. Texas & Pacific Railway, D.C., 99 F.Supp. 681, 1951 A.M.C. 1878, Eastern District of Louisiana, that in the enactment of the Louisiana direct-action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases