TAFFEL v. TAFFEL


279 A.D. 938 (1952)

Bessie Taffel, Appellant, v. Murray W. Taffel, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 24, 1952.


As so modified, the orders are affirmed, without costs.

The record on appeal does not disclose whether the limitation of the fine to $180 was based on a finding that the arrears were not more than that, or whether the fine was limited to a portion of the arrears, in discretion. If based on a finding that the arrears were only $180, the finding would be incorrect, as undoubtedly based on a requirement to pay $10 a week and not $25 a week. (See Bartenbach v. Bartenbach...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases