MURPHY v. PETERSON CIPHER CODE CORP.


303 N.Y. 912 (1952)

John Murphy, Respondent, v. Peterson Cipher Code Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 14, 1952


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Carson, Daniel Miner and Paul D. Carrigg for appellant.

Rubin Baron for respondent.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the jury was not clearly instructed that the written statement by the plaintiff's witness Bowman could not serve as affirmative evidence of substantive facts stated therein but only, as a means of impeachment, to prove that he had made a prior statement inconsistent with his testimony upon the trial. (Matter of Roge v. Valentine, 280 N.Y. 268, 276-277; Civ. Prac. Act, &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases