1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 196 F.2d
  5. 196 F.2d 1018 (1952)
 

BANKS WAREHOUSES, INC. v. WATT

No. 13112.

196 F.2d 1018 (1952)

William H. BANKS WAREHOUSES, Inc., a corporation, and John Alfred Halford, Appellants, v. George L. WATT et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied June 19, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. L. Eberle, T. H. Eberle and W. D. Eberle, all of Boise, Idaho, L. Duncan Lloyd, Wm. H. Hillier, Chicago, Ill. (Richards, Haga & Eberle, Boise, Idaho, Lord, Bissell & Kadyk, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellants.

Ray D. Agee, Frank L. Stephan, Beckwith & Langley and Parry, Keenan, Robertson & Daly, all of Twin Falls, Idaho, for appellees.

William R. Wallace, Jr., Maynard Garrison, William R. Ray and John R. Pascoe, all of San Francisco, Cal., amici curiæ.

Before MATHEWS, HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment in two consolidated actions — an action by William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and John Alfred Halford against W. Andrew Jean and others and an action by George L. Watt and others against William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and Underwriters at Lloyd's (London). On the grounds and for the reasons stated in the District Court's opinion, 96 F.Supp. 731, the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases