1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 250 S.W.2d
  5. 250 S.W.2d 941 (1952)
 

HIDALGO CTY. WATER IMP. DIST. v. CAMERON CTY. WATER CONTROL & IMP. DIST.

No. 12453.

250 S.W.2d 941 (1952)

HIDALGO COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. TWO et al. v. CAMERON COUNTY WATER CONTROL & IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. FIVE et al.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

July 16, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Strickland, Wilkins, Hall & Mills, Hill, Lochridge & King, Mission, Ewers, Cox & Toothaker, McAllen, Rankin, Kilgore & Cherry, Edinburg, for appellant.

Harbert Davenport, Sharpe, Cunningham & Garza, Brownsville, N. A. Colvin, San Benito, Johnson, Sloan, Phillips, Hester, Jenkins & Lewis, Kent, Brown & George, Harlingen, Rentfro, Rentfro & Vivier, Brownsville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Relators have asked for writs of prohibition and injunction against O. E. Van Berg as Master in Chancery (sometimes called River Master), certain other persons and certain Water Control and Improvement Districts, and against the Judge of the 107th District Court, during the pendency of an appeal from an order of that court. The essence of their position is that the trial court's interlocutory order was essentially the appointment of a receiver or a trustee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases