Per Curiam.
The only evidence introduced as to the value of the merchandise lost was that it was reasonably worth $4,577.49. The jury's verdict in the sum of $2,400 was obviously a compromise of liability or a compromise of the amount awarded plaintiff, which no hypothesis of the evidence could support. A judgment based on such compromise verdict cannot be sustained. (Friend v. Morris D. Fishman, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.