1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 280 A.D.
  5. 280 A.D. 885 (1952)
 

FRANKEL v. ROSENBLUM

280 A.D. 885 (1952)

Edward M. Frankel, Respondent, v. Charles Rosenblum, Doing Business under the Name of Stuart Lloyd Co., Appellant Charles Rosenblum et al., Appellants, v. Albert M. Greene et al., Doing Business as Greene-Frankel Co., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 30, 1952.

Order unanimously modified by inserting an additional decretal paragraph as follows: "The right of trial by jury of the factual issues in the action at law is preserved," and by striking the words "to the Jury" from the third decretal paragraph concerning the right to open and close.

We think that the justice presiding at the trial of the contract action should also dispose of the equitable issues taking such additional proof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases