ADJUSTMENT DEPT. ETC. v. SMEDEGARD

No. 31797.

40 Wn.2d 76 (1952)

241 P.2d 203

ADJUSTMENT DEPARTMENT, OLYMPIA CREDIT BUREAU, INC., Appellant, v. ALMA SMEDEGARD, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

February 14, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parr & Baker, for appellant.

O'Leary, Meyer & O'Leary, for respondent.


HILL, J.

The claims of error in giving and refusing to give instructions as they relate to the defense of fraud in an action upon a promissory note present the important questions before the court on this appeal.

The note was for $976.50, with interest at six per cent, payable on demand, upon which $200 had been paid. The note was payable to an undertaker and was for the expenses in connection with the funeral and burial of the respondent's late husband. As...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases