1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 23 N.J.
  5. 23 N.J. Super. 93 (1952)
 

JULIUS REINER CORP. v. SUTTON

23 N.J. Super. 93 (1952)

92 A.2d 634

JULIUS REINER CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. N. HOWARD SUTTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 19, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George D. Rothermel argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Harold T. Parker argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.

This appeal challenges the judgment entered in plaintiff's favor by the judge of the Burlington County District Court sitting without a jury. No stenographic record was made of the proceedings in the court below. The appeal is before us on a "Statement of the Evidence or Proceedings" settled and approved by the trial judge, and filed pursuant to Rule 1:2-23, incorporated by reference in Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases