1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 246 P.2d
  5. 246 P.2d 902 (1952)
 

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v. GOLDEN CYCLE CORP.

No. 16819.

246 P.2d 902 (1952)

120 Colo. 68

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al. v. GOLDEN CYCLE CORP.

Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ziegler & Hoyt, Colorado Springs, for plaintiff in error Byron W. Moffitt.

Duke Dunbar, Atty. Gen., H. Lawrence Hinkley, Deputy Atty. Gen., Peter L. Dye, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff in error Industrial Commission.

Thomas M. Burgess, Kenneth W. Geddes, Colorado Springs, for defendant in error.

HOLLAND, Justice.

Plaintiff in error is a claimant under the Workmen's Compensation Act, '35 C.S. A. c. 97, § 280 et seq., for damages for injuries received about October 9, 1950, near Colorado Springs on the premises of the Pikes Peak Fuel Company, a division of defendant in error, The Golden Cycle Corporation.

It was a sand and gravel pit operation. The Daniels Sand Company had some arrangement with the Pikes Peak Fuel Company to truck sand and gravel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases