SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. v. PODGORNY


200 Misc. 934 (1952)

Sears, Roebuck & Co., Plaintiff, v. Stanley Podgorny et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Seneca County.

January 7, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Wm. Koch for Mary Podgorny, defendant.

Robert E. Horton for plaintiff.


BLAUVELT, J.

Defendant Mary Podgorny moves to dismiss the summons with notice served upon her in this action on the grounds that the summons does not comply with the requirements of rule 45 of the Rules of Civil Practice, as amended. Specifically, the defendant contends that the summons does not state (1) the county where plaintiff resides; (2) the address of the plaintiff; (3) the county which the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases