1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 102 F.Supp.
  5. 102 F.Supp. 951 (1952)
 

MONOLITH PORTLAND MIDWEST CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION F. CORP.

Civ. No. 11816.

102 F.Supp. 951 (1952)

MONOLITH PORTLAND MIDWEST CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

February 20, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Richard E. Davis, and Joseph T. Enright, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Lillick, Geary & McHose, and Allan E. Charles, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.

The issue raised here is, "Whether or not a prime War Contractor, aggrieved of the findings of the contracting agency on his claim which had been filed pursuant to the war Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 101-125, is entitled to a jury trial when he seeks relief under Section 13(b) (2), 41 U.S.C.A. § 113(b) (2), of the Act?"

The facts of the present case are found in two former opinions, Monolith...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases