1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 98 N.E.2d
  5. 98 N.E.2d 1 (1951)
 

IN RE PULLINS

No. 32125.

98 N.E.2d 1 (1951)

155 Ohio St. 171

In re PULLINS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

March 28, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford Pullins, per se.

C. William O'Neill, Atty. Gen. and Max H. Dennis, Wilmington, for respondent warden.

PER CURIAM.

A proceeding in habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged errors or irregularities in the proceedings or sentence of a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St. 81; Ex parte Van Hagan, 25 Ohio St. 426; In re Allen, 91 Ohio St. 315, 326, 110 N.E. 535; State ex rel. Drexel, v. Alvis, Warden, 153 Ohio St. 244, 91 N.E.2d 22. An adequate remedy at law is afforded by way of review on appeal when the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases