STATE v. TINNIN

No. 669.

65 S.E.2d 884 (1951)

234 N.C. 75

STATE ex rel. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION v. TINNIN et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 17, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose & Sanford, Fayetteville, for appellants.

W. D. Holoman, R. B. Billings and D. G. Ball, all of Raleigh, for Employment Security Commission, appellee.


DENNY, Justice.

The statute under which the plaintiff seeks to collect certain contributions from the defendant, which it contends are due under the so-called contractor's clause, formerly known as G.S. § 96-8(f) (8), now repealed, reads as follows: "`Employer' means (8) Any employing unit, which contracts with or has under it any contractor or subcontractor for any employment which is part of its usual trade, occupation, profession, or business, and each such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases