1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 102 Cal.App.2d
  5. 102 Cal.App.2d 839 (1951)
 

WATERFORD IRRIGATION DIST. v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Docket No. 7836.

102 Cal.App.2d 839 (1951)

228 P.2d 341

WATERFORD IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, Respondent

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 15, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Minasian & Steadman for Appellant.

Frederick W. Reyland, Jr., County Counsel, and William R. Mitchell, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondent.

VAN DYKE, J.

Respondent, county of Stanislaus, in the year 1948 levied a tax upon a right owned by the appellant, Waterford Irrigation District, to divert water from the Tuolumne River. The tax was paid under protest and appellant district thereupon brought action in the Superior Court of Stanislaus County for recovery of the sum so paid. The trial court sustained respondent county's general demurrer, without leave to amend, and the question presented by this appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases