PER CURIAM.
The principal question presented is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in permitting counsel for the defendants, over objection, to repeatedly ask lay witnesses for their opinion as to whether the testator was able to dispose of his property by will.
Such procedure challenges a long existing and well established rule in this jurisdiction that opinions of such witnesses are not admissible where such opinions in fact answer the ultimate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.