The plaintiff-appellant has moved for reargument, or, in the alternative, for a correction of the Per Curiam opinion in this appeal (277 App. Div. 1097). Appellant applies for this relief upon the basis that the contention was not made by defendant below that the contract in suit was unconscionable and void and, further, that plaintiff's counsel did not make the concession mentioned in the Per Curiam opinion that plaintiff rendered no services under the earlier...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.