HAMLET v. HOOK

Docket No. 18236.

106 Cal.App.2d 791 (1951)

236 P.2d 196

ROBERT L. HAMLET, Appellant, v. ARTHUR W. HOOK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

October 16, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gray, Binkley & Pfaelzer, John T. Binkley and William G. Robertson for Appellant.

Bauder, Gilbert, Thompson & Kelly for Respondent.


HANSON, J. pro tem.

The only question we are called upon to determine in this case is whether the court erred in giving to the jury an instruction which was requested by the defendant and in refusing to give two instructions requested by the plaintiff, who is the appellant here. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant below, respondent here.

The record discloses that in broad daylight the automobiles driven...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases