1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 95 F.Supp.
  5. 95 F.Supp. 790 (1951)
 

LUDENA v. THE SANTA LUISA

95 F.Supp. 790 (1951)

LUDENA v. THE SANTA LUISA et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 19, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry D. Graham, New York City, for Libellant.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, New York City, for claimant Grace Line, Inc.

McGOHEY, District Judge.

Libellant having refused to appear for examination pursuant to a notice, the claimant moves under Local Admiralty Rule 46 and Admiralty Rule 32C, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order directing her to appear.

Under the decisions of this court in Mulligan v. United States1 and The Edmund Fanning,2 the motion would fail if sought only under Rule 32C.

Libellant argues that Local Admiralty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases