Upon the trial the contract, marked for identification, was excluded from evidence over appellant's objection. It is our opinion that the contract should have been received in evidence and other excluded proof permitted to determine whether the subscription of the seller's name in typewriting was authorized by the seller and made with the intention of subscribing the seller's name within the intent and meaning of section 259 of the Real Property Law. (Bork v. Martin
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SCARANE v. T. H. FRASER MORTGAGE CORP.
279 A.D. 602 (1951)
Frank J. Scarane, Appellant, v. T. H. Fraser Mortgage Corp. et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 15, 1951.
October 15, 1951.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
