In our opinion the papers submitted on the motion do not establish plaintiff's indigence. The facts alleged in the moving papers are not sufficient to justify preference in the trial of this cause over those of other litigants awaiting trial, and, hence, the granting of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (O'Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908; Thomas v. Green Bus Lines, 276 App. Div. 922; Keeler v. Greene, 273 App. Div. 976;
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LU ROBERTS v. ELLIS
279 A.D. 597 (1951)
Lu Roberts, Respondent, v. Arthur Ellis, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 8, 1951.
October 8, 1951.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
