KING v. CADE

No. 34300.

205 Okla. 666 (1951)

240 P.2d 88

KING et al. v. CADE et al.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing denied January 29, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall Pitman, Shawnee, for plaintiffs in error.

Reily, Reily & Spurr, Shawnee, for defendants in error.


PER CURIAM.

A.M. King and Vollie M. King, as plaintiffs, instituted this action in the lower court against C.M. Cade, Jr., and Bertha E. Cade, as defendants, to obtain a mandatory injunction requiring the defendants to remove a dam which the latter had constructed along the property line separating the litigants' farms. The Kings have appealed from an adverse judgment.

The record in this case is long, and the testimony of witnesses for the respective parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases