OLSON v. RINK


259 Wis. 599 (1951)

OLSON and wife, Respondents, vs. RINK and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 6, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank L. Morrow of Eau Claire, for the appellants.

For the respondents there was a brief by Dennis B. Danielson and Edward T. Vinopal, both of Eau Claire, and oral argument by Mr. Danielson.


GEHL, J.

But one question is presented: Is there any credible evidence which will support the jury's finding that Rink was causally negligent in failing to maintain proper lights on his truck? If there is, then under the familiar rule, to which we need cite no authorities, the judgment must be affirmed.

Olson testified that as he approached the truck he did not see any lights upon it. His wife's testimony is the same. Roger Brown, a traffic officer, called...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases