1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 106 F.Supp.
  5. 106 F.Supp. 742 (1951)
 

WALLACE v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.

No. 29015.

106 F.Supp. 742 (1951)

WALLACE v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law June 12, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ryan & Ryan, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Burton Mason and W. A. Gregory, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

GOODMAN, District Judge.

On the merits, the evidence does not sustain plaintiff's allegation that his discharge by defendant was a breach of the agreement delineating the terms of his employment. To the contrary, I find the evidence to be persuasive that the discharge of plaintiff was proper. Furthermore, as in Buberl v. Southern Pac. Co., D.C., 94 F.Supp. 11, plaintiff not only failed to pursue the remedies provided by the contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases