1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 259 Wis.
  5. 259 Wis. 583 (1951)
 

PEIFFER v. WAGNER

259 Wis. 583 (1951)

PEIFFER and another, Appellants, vs. WAGNER and another, Respondents. [Two cases.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 6, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Byrne, Bubolz & Spanagel of Appleton, and Runkel & Runkel of Port Washington, and oral argument by Edward J. Byrne and Paul Runkel.

For the respondents there was a brief by Schanen, Schanen & Pauly and Frank X. Didier, all of Port Washington, and oral argument by Mr. Erwin Pauly and Mr. Didier.

FAIRCHILD, J.

It is stipulated that the questions involved in the above-entitled cases are the same as those considered and determined in the cases of Wagner v. Peiffer, ante, p. 566, 49 N.W.2d 739. The ruling in the foregoing cases apply here, and the judgments must be affirmed.

By the Court.—Judgments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases