DI GIORGIO FRUIT CORP. et al.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 16, 1950.
Decided June 21, 1951.
Writ of Certiorari Denied November 5, 1951.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Marion B. Plant, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Alvin J. Rockwell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioners.
Mr. Paul S. Kuelthau, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Mr. Bernard Dunau, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent National Labor Relations Board.
Messrs. Karl D. Loos and John F. Donelan, Washington, D. C., filed briefs as amici curiae on behalf of the Agricultural Producers Labor Committee, Western Growers Association and California Grape and Tree Fruit League, and on behalf of the Agricultural Council of California, urging reversal.
Miss Kathryn Casey, Washington, D. C., filed a brief as amicus curiae on behalf of the International Apple Association, urging reversal.
Messrs. Eugene O'Dunne, Jr., and John Ward Cutler, Washington, D. C., filed a brief as amici curiae on behalf of the National Potato Council and United Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Association, urging reversal.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PRETTYMAN and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Writ of Certiorari Denied November 5, 1951. See 72 S.Ct. 110.
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us upon a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, which dismissed a complaint, issued by the General Counsel of the Board, charging two unions with unfair practices under the so-called secondary boycott provision of the National Labor Relations Act.1 The petitioners are the Di Giorgio Fruit...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
