SWITZER v. MARZALL

Civ. No. 597-49.

95 F.Supp. 721 (1951)

SWITZER et al. v. MARZALL, Commissioner of Patents.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

March 2, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert L. Ely, Cleveland, Ohio, Bacon & Thomas, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

E. L. Reynolds, Solicitor, U. S. Patent Office, Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C., for defendant.


KEECH, District Judge.

The question before the Court is whether it has jurisdiction to entertain defendant's "Motion to Obtain Relief from Decree."

Briefly, the chronology of this case is as follows:

December 13, 1950, the decree authorizing issuance to plaintiff of letters patent was signed.

January 30, 1951, defendant filed his motion for relief from the decree on the ground of newly discovered evidence (an alleged anticipation by the prior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases