SANDSTROM v. ESTATE OF CLAUSEN


258 Wis. 534 (1951)

SANDSTROM, Respondent, vs. ESTATE OF CLAUSEN and others, Defendants: HARDWARE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 6, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Toebaas, Hart, Kraege & Jackman of Madison, and oral argument by W. L. Jackman.

F. W. Cosgrove, attorney, and S. Richard Heath of counsel, both of Fond du Lac, for the respondent.


BROWN, J.

Sec. 204.30 (3), Stats., has remained unchanged since 1943. Numerous cases have come before us requiring its interpretation and have resulted in decisions which it now seems impossible to reconcile. In such a situation we consider it advisable to re-examine the statute with as little bias as possible because of what we have said on other occasions. So viewed, and in the light of our experience with many cases which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases