PER CURIAM.
Appellants were convicted of violations of the Marihuana Tax Act, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 2591(a), 2593(a). Appellant James M. Roberts was also convicted of a violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 2553(a), 2554(a). We have examined the record and find no prejudicial error. The judgments of the District Court are accordingly
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.